Eighteen consultants Intervention in critical issues of Irpinia Sanyo Chamber of Commerce In a letter addressed to the President of the Chamber of Commerce, Joseph Bruno. The letter is signed by: Berardino Pesci, Amalia della Sala, Giuseppe Marinelli, Piero Mastrobrardino, Fabio Galletta, Salvatore Bonavita, Mariana Venuti, Oreste La Stella, Gaetana Adessa, Libero Secca, Nicola Zotti, Ignazio Caturo, Rita Di Luca, Giacomeo Caturo , Reno Limo, Antonio Mazzrantono, Claudio Monteforte, Anna Pisa.
“The current situation that has arisen – explain the members of the Council – imposes calm considerations and assessments at the moment of crisis of the elected bodies of the Chamber of Commerce of Irpinia Sanyo. With the intention of analyzing what is happening, it is appropriate to make some assumptions also by retracing the stages that have brought us to the present situation, despite the fact that only four months have passed since his election. You have been elected on July 19, 2022, and although the convening of the council for the election of Giunta can proceed quickly, you have decided, independently, to convene the first council on September 28, more than two months later; – Motivating the press, not the advisors, that it was appropriate to wait for the end of campaigning for political elections before the Council of the Chamber convened. We do not yet understand the relationship of his decision to wait for the outcome of the general elections.
Finally, – they continue -, on September 28, the Council elected a Giunta, and thus, the governing bodies of the Entity could have proceeded to their full operations immediately, even if the elected Giunta did not quite respond to their wishes. However, despite the delays already highlighted, you decide to continue working “alone” with urgently approved decisions, making use of Giunta’s alternative powers, and even procrastinating on important decisions that are about to be finalized such as the interim administration and the assessment of the interim budget forecasts. . Giunta’s first meeting took place only on October 24, 2022, thus about a month after his election and four months after the election of the President, with 26 items on the agenda, all of the utmost importance, and with many endorsements of resolutions adopted urgently. . Already in the First Council on October 24 strong disagreements were highlighted, and between abstentions and dissenting votes, he
Only some of the measures had a chance to be approved thanks to the vote of only four members out of eight.
At that session – the memorandum confirms – some decisions were under discussion which required special study, both in terms of legality and opportunity, such as: the General Secretariat – Provisions (the appropriation you think can be assigned to Dr. Peruzzi, in continuity with the former position of Secretary General of the Avellino departments extinct, without starting a new open procedure).
Appointment of an Independent Evaluation Body (appointment you think could be assigned to Dr. Musella who, at the time
Submitting an expression of interest (by 31/12/2021) was the sole applicant under his (same) will of the entity, being at that time the Ministerial Commissioner of the Avellino Chamber.
And at the October 24 session – the memo explains – the imaginable “commitments, agreements and promises” associated with his election as president were discussed. No trace of this kind of discussion was found in the minutes of the meeting. There was also public evidence of these events, with statements made by Chancellor Caturo where he highlighted his opposition to certain decisions, by Vice President La Stella who appealed to respect the commitments made in favor of the continuation of the entity, and by his vice president, vaguely. Acts of accusation only for those who target
Personal Gain… In this climate we got to the meeting of the Council on the 4th of November, and even there he had to make a note
Difficulty in supporting advisors for her administrative work. There were 6 absences from this board, which he claimed were justified, and decisions on program accounting documents, and therefore works of political/administrative importance and not just technical documents, were rejected with 11 votes in favor, including the decisions of La Stella and Addesa (Giunta members ) along with other councilors from their district, 11 abstained and 5 voted against. Therefore, it was clear to all that if there were only 6 votes from 11 countries to abstain, they would vote against the motions for
All president program will be rejected. As a result of the November 4 Council, the Giunta convened shortly after the lack of quorum was recorded, the same was for the November 16 session, which reached Giunta on November 25 where 6 out of 8 members voted against the October 24 meeting minutes, with reasons Justified at length with various remarks, then abandoning the meeting. On what happened until November 25, I decided to respond with data on devices
Journalist who, in fact, forwarded his formal indictment against those who, in his opinion, obstruct the organization with great damage to business and territory.
The thrust of his statements is serious and so is the terminology used – they add – highlighting the fact that there can be elements and/or events that managers are not aware of. We think it’s time to bring the discussion back to the only specific place: the Irpinia Sanyo Chamber of Commerce Council. We think it useless and harmful to continue discussion at a distance in the press or by seeking contacts with individual directors, or by holding useless and ill-attended meetings outside the office of the Chamber, and
Only with any of the subjects of the associations recognized by the CNEL. As you yourself stated: “The Chief is not elected by the Giunta and is therefore not bound by a bond of trust towards them.” He is right: the president is elected by the council and must be accountable to it for his mandate and work.
As mentioned and highlighted – at the conclusion of the memorandum – the undersigned advisors ask you to suspend all planned activities of Giunta and any other programmatic activity that requires a decision on its part, considering it necessary and essential that you report to the Council on the institutional crisis of the Chamber of Commerce of Irpinia Sanyo that has been created and, in this place, adopts the relevant initiatives as an initiative,
In favor of the Chamber, regions and companies. Accordingly, we submit an official request, in accordance with the law, statutes and regulations, to hold an urgent extraordinary session of the Chamber Council to discuss the following item on the agenda: the political / administrative situation and the relationship between the elected bodies. IAA Irpinia Sannio Chamber of Commerce. Communication, comparison and evaluations.